In 1380,
an important stage was reached in France: the appearance of the word transparence
(transparency), which comes down to saying that the concept got formulated.
It would seem that, from this moment on, the transparency is explicitly conceived
as a plastic element.
At the 15th century Renaissance, as the models were drawn from the Antiquity,
one re-used the transparency effect of elements like the colonnade or the portico.
First in Italy, with Palladio, Bramante and Bernin, the frontage gives a new
relationship between building and urban space. Its elements - especially colonnades
and windows - create a physical and visual transition between inside and outside,
between private and public.
In parallel, the Italian gardens open, on the surrounding landscape, windows
of cut plants. One finds the principle of visual transition.
In the 17th century, transparency enters the vocabulary of architecture: the
substantive "transparent" indicates "a very thin ornamental
panel lit from behind (1762); it applies to a decorative openwork motif, used
in both architecture and sculpture (in particular in the Spanish baroque style)"
In the 18th century, the effect of transparency takes a moral connotation. This
will have an echo in the 20th century. The return to transparency wants then
to be a "new social order". One compares the physical transparency
to the ethical transparency.
the 19th century, the Haussmann's
boulevards give an urban scale to transparency. They break with the winding
streets inherited from the Middle Ages. They have an objective which is above
all very functional: to regulate traffic problems. But, in fact, they offer
long continuous prospects which bring depth to the perception of the town (2)
Moreover, the work of Haussmann systematizes the plantation of trees rows,
which allows for another form of transparency: transparency effect of plants,
variable according to the seasons (3).
At the beginning
of the 20th century, transparency takes a major place, because of the relation
which it creates between the sequences of public spaces, as well as between
public space and private space.
The piles are an essential tool of modernism, for they have the advantage to
release some land (4). It
is the beginning of a type of transparency which is independent of the volume
of the building, and at the scale of both the city and the pedestrian.
Glass construction, since the middle of the 19th century, has been made possible
by metal structures (greenhouses of Kew Garden, 1848).
One sees once again the effect transparency acting on the private-public relationship,
with the ambivalent inversion of the visual inside-outside relationship, between
day and night (5).
The glazed building becomes the standard of international architecture, and
finally leads, by multiplying an effect of reflection, to the construction
of virtual urban landscapes (6).
The Jean Nouvel building for the Cartier foundation illustrates the current integration of transparency in urban production, by combining several properties. The filter frontage, sort of grid entry to the building behind it, manifests a limit, registered in the alignment of the Boulevard Raspail. The transparency effect makes it possible to build a transition between public space and the building (7).
The effect
of transparency is today in the center of the development of a whole of space
concepts, like the concept of filter, or that of framing, of urban window.
The transparency effect is perceived as being able to qualify a space. This
is why those transparency effects (fences, alignments, urban windows...), which
will have as a finality to make the city breathe, will be recommended or preserved
by the town planning documents.
One measures well the progression of the effect of transparency: born from essentially
functional intentions, it is now itself an object of regulation, of specific
concerns.
CF. TOWN GATE, FENCE, URBAN PROSPECT, ALIGNMENT / BUILDING LINE, VEGETAL/WOODY
EFFECT, REFLECTION EFFECT, URBAN WINDOW, GRID